Cheque-Bounce Complaint and Money Recovery Suit: Choosing the Route
They are frequently spoken of as alternatives, as though a creditor must pick one. They are not alternatives, they do different things, and the sensible question is not which one but what each is for. This note sets out how they differ and what that means in practice.
Guide
They are different proceedings doing different things
A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act is a criminal proceeding. Its subject is the drawer's conduct in issuing a cheque that was not honoured, and it proceeds before a Magistrate under criminal procedure.
A suit for recovery is a civil proceeding. Its subject is the debt, and what it produces if successful is a decree — an order that the sum is due, which can then be executed against the debtor's assets. The two run on different tracks and are not mutually exclusive.
What each is actually good for
The statutory complaint is generally the faster route to pressure. It puts the drawer in a criminal proceeding they must attend and answer, and it is often what produces a settlement. Provisions introduced in 2018 allow a court in appropriate cases to direct interim compensation while the complaint is pending, which strengthens that position further.
The civil suit is the route to a decree that can be executed. If the object is to reach assets — a bank account, a property, a receivable — that requires a decree, and a criminal complaint does not produce one. Where the sum is substantial and the debtor has assets, the civil claim is not an afterthought.
What each requires by way of proof
The statutory route depends on a chain of documents and dates: the cheque, the return memo, a demand notice sent within the period allowed, proof of its service, and a complaint filed within the further period allowed. If that chain is broken the remedy may be unavailable however clear the debt.
The civil claim depends on establishing the debt itself: what was supplied or lent, on what terms, what remains due. The cheque is evidence in that claim, but it is not the whole of it. This is why the underlying records — invoices, ledgers, correspondence — matter in both proceedings and should be assembled at the outset.
Running both
Both are commonly pursued together, and there is no rule requiring a creditor to abandon one to bring the other. What has to be handled is the relationship between them: what is said in one proceeding is available in the other, and a settlement in either has to be documented so that it disposes of both.
Sequencing also matters practically. The statutory route is time-critical and cannot wait; the civil claim generally has more room. Where both are intended, the usual course is to protect the time-critical remedy first and file the civil claim on a considered basis rather than in haste.
If you are on the receiving end
A drawer facing a complaint is not without answers. The presumptions the Act raises are rebuttable, and the defences that actually work are documentary: that the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt, that it was given as security in circumstances that have not arisen, that the amount claimed is not what was owed, or that the statutory requirements were not complied with.
What does not work is ignoring it. A complaint that goes unanswered proceeds, and the consequences of non-appearance in a criminal proceeding are of a different order from those in a civil one. Advice should be taken as soon as a notice arrives, not when a summons does.
Checklist
Practical Checklist
- Decide what you actually wantPressure to settle, a decree to execute, or both. The answer determines the route or routes.
- Protect the time-critical remedy firstThe statutory route runs on fixed periods; the civil claim generally has more room.
- Assemble the underlying recordsInvoices, ledgers, agreements and correspondence support both proceedings and are needed in either.
- Establish the correct forum for eachThe criminal complaint and the civil suit are not necessarily filed in the same place.
- Consider the debtor's assetsIf there is nothing to execute against, a decree is worth less than the pressure of a complaint. If there is, the reverse may apply.
- Document any settlement to cover bothA settlement that disposes of one proceeding and leaves the other alive helps nobody.
- Keep the proceedings consistentWhat is asserted in one is available in the other.
Cautions
Common Mistakes
- Treating them as alternativesThey are separate remedies. Choosing one does not require giving up the other.
- Relying on the complaint to recover moneyIt is a criminal proceeding. It does not produce a decree that can be executed against assets.
- Filing the civil suit and letting the statutory periods lapseThe civil claim generally has more room; the statutory route does not, and waiting can lose it.
- Building either case on the cheque aloneThe underlying transaction has to be capable of proof, in both proceedings.
- Settling one proceeding informallyA settlement that is not documented across both leaves the other running.
- Ignoring a notice or a summonsNon-appearance in a criminal proceeding has consequences of a different order. Take advice when the notice arrives.
See also
Related Services
Provenance
Authorship and Review
About this note
Published by H.R. Legal Associate, advocates, Lucknow, for general information.
Date published
Date reviewed
Important
Disclaimer
This note is general information about an area of law. It is not legal advice, it is not an advertisement or a solicitation of work, and reading it creates no advocate–client relationship.
Which forum hears each proceeding, the periods that apply, and what a particular set of facts will support are matters that depend on the documents and the current state of the law. They should be confirmed for the specific matter before either proceeding is commenced.
Procedures, limitation periods, court fees, stamp duty, government charges and tax rates change, and what applies depends on the facts of the particular matter. Nothing here should be acted on without advice taken on your own documents, and no outcome is promised or predicted.
Contact
Discuss a Matter With the Office
If a question on this page touches something you are dealing with, it should be looked at on your own documents. Sending an enquiry does not create an advocate–client relationship, and confidential documents should not be sent through this website.